« back to article

Discuss “Second installment of campus nuclear policy survey”

Nuclear weapons have typically been used in deterring a nation, also in possession of nuclear weapons, from using them. Historically, deterrence has been very successful in preventing the usage of nuclear weapons, but hardly successful in preventing the spread of nuclear weapons to other countries. From the political standpoint, the threat of nuclear force can be a convincing bargaining chip; however, their justification becomes a much more difficult argument because the practical uses of nuclear weapons are few when compared to what can be accomplished with conventional weapons. Many say history has revealed that possessing these great weapons neither prevents disastrous wars nor does it guarantee victory. What contingencies could arise where...

Comments

Be heard

Name:
Required
Email:
Optional
Comment:

Comment guidelines

If you provide an email address, it will be displayed. This may make you more vulnerable to spammers.

HTML is not allowed. Paragraphs are automatically created by leaving a blank line. Links are created from URLs automatically.

Off-topic or inappropriate (e.g. obscene, libelous) comments are not permitted and will be removed.

Important: The Tartan provides these discussion boards to encourage discussion about the topics we report. The views and opinions expressed in these comments are those of their authors, and do not reflect the opinions of The Tartan.