« back to article

Discuss “Student Senate poorly represents constituents”

Undergraduate Student Senate elections come only once a year, but the repercussions of having an aloof and ineffective representative body plagues students all year long.

Two weeks ago, Senate approved a resolution supporting the proposed amendment of the Students’ Rights Policy by a vote of 9–7, with eight Senators abstaining. By Senate standards, the only reason a Senator should abstain from a vote is if there is a conflict of personal interest. The Senate chair customarily abstains, but there is no excuse for the other seven abstentions. It is extraordinarily unlikely that seven Senators had a direct conflict of interest in the matter, and it is obvious that these Senators either failed to research this controversial issue or they were...

Comments

Be heard

Name:
Required
Email:
Optional
Comment:

Comment guidelines

If you provide an email address, it will be displayed. This may make you more vulnerable to spammers.

HTML is not allowed. Paragraphs are automatically created by leaving a blank line. Links are created from URLs automatically.

Off-topic or inappropriate (e.g. obscene, libelous) comments are not permitted and will be removed.

Important: The Tartan provides these discussion boards to encourage discussion about the topics we report. The views and opinions expressed in these comments are those of their authors, and do not reflect the opinions of The Tartan.