« back to article

Discuss “Editorial poorly portrays Senate”

This letter does not represent the views of Senate as a whole. Similarly, last week’s editorial, “Student Senate poorly represents constituents,” does very little to accurately represent Senate as a whole, choosing instead to rely on blanket generalizations and inflammatory language.

While there are certainly some valid criticisms in the piece, particularly regarding abstentions and outreach, I am disappointed at the extent to which things were exaggerated. Senators that may have had a conflicting obligation “didn’t bother to show up,” and any abstention, even valid, was called “lazy.” The allegation that the whole Senate “failed to uncover ... dangerous baggage” in a policy that was the purview of a specific committee...

Comments

Be heard

Name:
Required
Email:
Optional
Comment:

Comment guidelines

If you provide an email address, it will be displayed. This may make you more vulnerable to spammers.

HTML is not allowed. Paragraphs are automatically created by leaving a blank line. Links are created from URLs automatically.

Off-topic or inappropriate (e.g. obscene, libelous) comments are not permitted and will be removed.

Important: The Tartan provides these discussion boards to encourage discussion about the topics we report. The views and opinions expressed in these comments are those of their authors, and do not reflect the opinions of The Tartan.

Print Edition

Front Page

PDF (6.52 MB)